{"id":29,"date":"2007-01-16T21:30:51","date_gmt":"2007-01-16T21:30:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/london-lawsuit-laboratory\/"},"modified":"2007-01-16T21:30:51","modified_gmt":"2007-01-16T21:30:51","slug":"london-lawsuit-laboratory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/london-lawsuit-laboratory\/","title":{"rendered":"London: &#8216;lawsuit laboratory&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p align=\"left\"><a title=\"Cohen Milstein Hausfeld &#038; Toll PLLC\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/cmht.com\/\">Cohen Milstein Hausfeld &#038; Toll PLLC<\/a>&#8216;s London office, as WV&#038;Z reported on in a <a title=\"Cohen Milstein is moving to London!\" href=\"http:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/cohen-milstein-is-moving-to-london\/\">previous post<\/a>, remains in the news (though they haven&#8217;t updated their <a title=\"Cohen Milstein's locations\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/cmht.com\/ourlocations.php\">locations<\/a> themselves yet.) In line with the FT&#8217;s earlier focus on the firm&#8217;s anti-trust practice, today the <a title=\"London Becomes Lab For U.S.-Style Lawsuits\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB116890257855677048.html?mod=home_whats_news_europe\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> (on the front page, no less; to access online, subscription required) reports on the move and what the move could mean for London in terms of the UK taking on an examplary role in using private litigation to enforce anti-trust legislation in the European Union. (Also, see the <a title=\"Will the Sun Never Set on Plaintiffs\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 Firms Empires?\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/law\/2006\/10\/17\/will-the-sun-never-set-on-plaintiffs-firms-empires\/\">WSJ Law Blog<\/a> on this topic  earlier.) It notes too that <a title=\"Howrey LLP\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.howrey.com\/\">Howrey LLP<\/a>, which already has an office here, is hiring competition partners as well.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Philip Collins, formerly a competition partner with <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Lovells\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lovells.com\/\">Lovells<\/a> and counsel with <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale &#038; Dorr LLP\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wilmerhale.com\/\">Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale &#038; Dorr LLP<\/a> and currently Chairman of the <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Office of Fair Trading\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oft.gov.uk\/\">Office of Fair Trading<\/a>, the UK&#8217;s competition enforcement agency, is cautiously optimistic: &#8220;There&#8217;s a lot that can be learned from the American system. [&#8230;] We must take a measured approach.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The article mentions the US case against a vitamins cartel, in which among others Cohen Milstein acted as counsel, as an example of a case that could have been beneficial to potential plaintiffs outside the US, but who were not included in the settlement. (See Cohen Milstein&#8217;s <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Vitamins Antitrust Litigation\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cmht.com\/cases_vitaminsinternational.php\">Vitamins Antitrust Litigation<\/a> section on its website and for example the US Department of Justice pamphlet <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"DoJ Antitrust pamphlet\" href=\"http:\/\/www.usdoj.gov\/atr\/public\/div_stats\/211491.htm\">&#8216;Antitrust Enforcement and the Consumer&#8217;<\/a>  for more.)<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">What the article <em>doesn&#8217;t<\/em> mention is that Cohen Milstein apparently has already had a hand in English and EC proceedings regarding the vitamins cartel, having &#8220;worked extensively&#8221; with City firm <a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Irwin Mitchell\" href=\"http:\/\/www.irwinmitchell.com\/\">Irwin Mitchell<\/a>, according to the latter&#8217;s April 2006 <a title=\"Reponses to Green Paper \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (\u00e2\u20ac\u0153the Green Paper\u00e2\u20ac\u009d)\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/comm\/competition\/antitrust\/others\/actions_for_damages\/095.pdf\">submission<\/a> in response to the European Commission&#8217;s <a title=\"Green Paper - Damages Actions for Breach of the EC antitrust rules\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/comm\/competition\/antitrust\/actionsdamages\/documents.html#greenpaper\">Anti-trust Green Paper<\/a>. As it says there (submission p.1), Irwin Mitchell represents a number of claimants in the English courts in &#8220;their claims concerning the operation of the <em>Vitamins <\/em>cartel.&#8221; (Note it there also endorses Cohen Milstein&#8217;s own Green Paper response <a title=\"Comments on the Green Paper\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/comm\/competition\/antitrust\/others\/actions_for_damages\/008.pdf\">submission<\/a>.) Members of that cartel have been fined by the European Commission in the case also known as <a title=\"Press release concerning Judgments of the Court of First Instance in Cases T-15\/02 &#038; T-26\/02\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/en\/actu\/communiques\/cp06\/aff\/cp060022en.pdf\"><em>Re Vitamins Cartel<\/em><\/a>, now this firm is <a title=\"Vitamins cartel - claims for compensation\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.irwinmitchell.com\/News\/VitaminsCartelClaimsForCompensation.htm\">claiming for compensation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The Journal concludes with a quote from a representative of the US Chamber of Commerce affiliated <a title=\"Institute for Legal Reform\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.instituteforlegalreform.com\/\">Institute for Legal Reform<\/a>.  No points for guessing its position and views on the plaintiffs&#8217; bar. (But here are two clues: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.instituteforlegalreform.com\/securitiesclassaction\/index.html\">one<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.instituteforlegalreform.com\/newsroom\/electionnightpollresults.html\">two<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Today&#8217;s latest reporting aside, WV&#038;Z dug up two earlier articles &#8211; published in <a title=\"Can You Say Tort? (20 December 2004)\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/global\/2004\/1220\/022.html\">Forbes<\/a> and in <a title=\"Michael Hausfield brings class actions to the UK (24 October 2005)\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thelawyer.com\/cgi-bin\/item.cgi?id=117237&#038;d=11&#038;h=24&#038;f=23\">TheLawyer<\/a> &#8211; on Cohen Milstein&#8217;s <a title=\"Michael D. Hausfeld\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cmht.com\/attorneys_hausfeld.php\">Michael D. Hausfeld<\/a>&#8216;s ambitions outside the US. A quote:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">&#8220;I wish I had no opportunity. [&#8230;] I only have an opportunity if someone has committed a mass wrong.  We&#8217;re answering a need in a void.  There&#8217;s a void in the sense that there aren&#8217;t many lawyers that practise at our level and undertake the cases that we do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cohen Milstein Hausfeld &#038; Toll PLLC&#8216;s London office, as WV&#038;Z reported on in a previous post, remains in the news (though they haven&#8217;t updated their locations themselves yet.) In line with the FT&#8217;s earlier focus on the firm&#8217;s anti-trust practice, today the Wall Street Journal (on the front page, no less; to access online, subscription [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kranenburgesq.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}